[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Origin of Birds

At 08:59 PM 12/4/97 -0800, Jonathon Woolf wrote:
>Thomas R. Holtz, Jr. wrote:
>> (Feduccia and Martin have both published on the fact that they "know"
>> cladistic analytical methodology MUST be wrong, because it keeps on putting
>> birds within the coelurosaur dinosaurs, even when different peoples
>> different data sets are used...)
>Did I read that right?  Feduccia and Martin dismiss cladistic analysis
>out-of-hand, simply because it conflicts with their assumptions about
>bird origins?

   If memory serves, Feduccia says this outright in the _Audubon_ article
about _Sinosauropteryx_.

** Dinosauria On-Line. Home of THE DINOSTORE ** "Those who trade a        **
** (Dino stuff for sale), Jeff's Journal of  ** little freedom for a      **
** Dinosaur Paleontology, Jeff's Dinosaur    ** little security will soon **
** Picture Gallery, and The DOL Dinosaur     ** find they have none of    **
** Omnipedia. http://www.dinosauria.com      ** either." -- Jeff Poling   **