[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Dinosaur Genera List corrections #67

In a message dated 97-01-30 13:49:12 EST, znc14@ttacs1.ttu.edu (Jonathan R.
Wagner) writes:

<<  Thus, any other tree should include a
 *greater* number of homoplasies.  So what you're saying is nonsense. >>

A reversal is not a homoplasy. I'm not talking about homoplasies here. Again,
please read what I wrote: "...Unfortunately, his character matrix contains so
>reversals and unknowns as to make the analysis dubious...."