[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Audobon bird/dino article
[Feduccia] includes animals in his arguments against a close bird/dino
>relationship that we HAVE NO FOSSIL EVIDENCE FOR as gospel scientific
>proof for an argument.
> "Well, any engineer will tell you that's aerodynamically
>impossible. In every group of
> animals that flies or glides-BATS, frogs, snakes,
>squirrels-it's evolved from the trees down."
>a)What possible evidence does he have for bat origins? Everything we
>have that's been identified as a fossil bat is because it has batwings
>and already flies. WE HAVE NO FOSSIL RECORD FOR WHERE BATS COME FROM AT
>b)Frogs didn't start in the trees.
Surely this is a semantical objection. Ultimately, nothing
"started" in trees.
Remove SPAMKILLER from return address to reply.
"Dammit, Philbert; what kind of a lepidopterist are you? For god's
man; stand up to them!"