[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: ROM's TYRANNOSAURUS



Darren Naish wrote:

>No no no.. Pete, I may be dyslexic but I know the difference between MOR
>and ROM. The new _T. rex_ mount I was referring to is at the Royal Ontario
>Museum.  Note that in my original post I even put ROM in >parentheses< to
>emphasise that I was talking about a new place.
>
>In another post, someone had a go at me for criticising the ROM mount. I
>was not criticising it - re-read my post! I was/am simply amazed at how
>odd the mount is. I'd still like to hear something of its history.

Since I will be going to the ROM in a couple of months, exactly what is so
odd about the mount?

Chris

cnedin@geology.adelaide.edu.au                  nedin@ediacara.org
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Many say it was a mistake to come down from the trees, some say
the move out of the oceans was a bad idea. Me, I say the stiffening
of the notochord in the Cambrian was where it all went wrong,
it was all downhill from there.