[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: SPOILERS: LOST WORLD Errors (REALLY, don't look)
In a message dated 97-05-24 08:50:55 EDT, dunn1@IDT.NET writes:
<< This hunter would want a male
if he didn't know anything about current dinosaur-theory and assumed
that the male was bigger. Then again, maybe INGEN noticed the
(entirely plausible) fact that male tyrannosaurs were larger. I
don't believe that a pack of Virginia Slims or a Cosmo have been
found with the robust morph yet, so the jury's still out . . . >>
Anybody notice that INGEN might have been named after the oviraptorid
_Ingenia_? Mere coincidence, right?
Also, any comments on dinosaur behavior within JP or LW must founder on the
fact that the creatures were genetically engineered with lots of frog DNA and
whatnot, and so would behave in whatever manner the moviemakers wanted,
irrespective of how dinosaurs might actually have behaved pre-65 Ma.