[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: dinosaur upland faunas?
At 10:46 AM 5/29/97 -0500, Mark Sumner wrote:
>I was under the impression that Pachycephalosaurs were considered
>upland species. The scarcity of non-skull material, and the
>condition of many skulls, has been taken as evidence that the Pachys
>not living in the same area as the more frequently preserved species.
For the same reasons I have often speculated that many, or most,
ankylosaurs were upland species.
I do kind of like the picture of pachycephalosaurs as the goats of the
Cretaceous, capering around the rocks of the proto-Rockies.
May the peace of God be with you. email@example.com