[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: DEFINE BIRD
In a message dated 97-10-21 03:03:12 EDT, firstname.lastname@example.org writes:
<< On Mon, 20 Oct 1997, Jeffrey Martz wrote:
> Could someone post the precise definition of Aves? Variations not
> based on the assumptions that birds are descended from _Archaeopteryx_
> and/or theropods might be interesting.
Official cladistic definition: the most recent ancestor of _Archaeopteryx_
and modern birds and all of that ancestor's descendants. >>
Since there's not yet any such thing as an "official" definition of Aves
(ICZN ignores taxa higher than family level), I've been using the following
stem-based definition: Aves = all dinosaurs more closely related to
_Megalosaurus_ than to _Iguanodon_. Not even priority rules in this realm;
only popular acceptance (otherwise theropods would be called goniopods and
Maybe it's time to change the rules?