[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Phyl tax misunderstandings (was Re: tetrapoda)

On Sun, 16 Nov 1997 Jonkeria@aol.com wrote:

> Arguments on exactly what "legginess" is aside, isn't there the clade
> Eotetrapoda to enclose Ichthyostega & friends + Tetrapoda according to
> Laurin? This excludes basal tetrapodomorphs such as Elpistostege and all the
> other "fish".
> -C. Kammerer

This is indeed very helpful info for me, any idae about a year or even a
full citation for the reference?  Thank you sooooo much for this much and
for any further info, thanks in advance.