[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Elmisauridae and holotypes



>In a message dated 97-11-22 20:52:45 EST, Gothgrrl@AOL.COM writes:
>
><< If a skull is found, and no
> other material, and there exists a named species without a skull, how is
> the double name problem avoided? >>
>
>It often isn't. For example, we have two sauropods from the Nemegt:
>_Nemegtosaurus_ and _Opisthocoelicaudia_. The former is based on a skull, the
>latter on a headless and neckless skeleton. Who's to say that they're not the
>same genus?

I'm sure 'Brontosaurus' would have some witty comments on the situation...;)

Cheerio
Brian Choo