[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: bipedal lunges
Most creatures are vulnerable to attack from behind - nothing unusual
What if the triceratops used an aggressive defense - i.e. once it
figures out there's a threat, it takes action rather than try to ignore
it and rely on a passive defense.
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org[SMTP:email@example.com]
> Reply To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 1997 1:59 PM
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: RE: bipedal lunges
> After mulling over the comments of John Calvin and Bill, I concede.
> I'm struggling with is the physical and tactical difficulty of a
> "charge" by
> a ceratopsian combined with the highly variable geometry of the
> armament. For actual defense against predators, how do we get the
> horns, or
> even the beak, into play while still -- literally -- allowing the
> ceratopsian to cover his ass? That's a big, vulnerable target, no
> how well-protected the head. Either the backside is never exposed
> (e.g. by
> stolid group defense) or there's some way for the beast to turn
> rapidly. I
> was trying to come up with a behavior which would allow some of both.
> are the other alternatives?
> --Toby White