[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
At 10:41 AM 10/16/97 -0500, Jonathan R. Wagner wrote:
> I have not read the origional _Protoavis_ article
>completely (no time), but I know for a fact that Chatterjee currently
>believes that _Protoavis_ *is* a theropod. Period.
I have read *most* of the original article.
He may not have *quite* proposed a crocodilian relationship for _Protoavis_
(and thus for birds), but the paper most certainly strongly implied that.
I am beginning to wonder if he doesn't start out with his more outre ideas
just to get people thinking. (He once proposed and odd idea about the
origin of Tyrannosaurids, which he subsequently dropped).
May the peace of God be with you. firstname.lastname@example.org