[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Cursorial adaptations (was T.rex and elephants)
Ralph Miller III wrote:
> _T.rex_ and elephants? What the?!
'Twasn't my idea, I just joined an ongoing thread! <g>
Good discussion, though. Thanks. I have that SciAm collection; I'll
have to look up that article when I have some free time next month. <g>
> As you can see, an elephant has NONE of these adaptations. Did anyone (who
> has not seen _George of the Jungle_) have any doubts about this? Elephants
> are graviportal. End of story.
Step your feet, slap your tail
Seven on the Richter Scale
Ev'rybody lumber to
The Graviportal Polka!
("The Graviportal Polka," DR. JANE'S FOSSIL FEVER) (sorry,
> And as for our cherished _Tyrannosaurus rex_. What of him? In my view,
> _Tyrannosaurus_ clearly does not share all of the cursorial adaptations of
> modern mammals. But that's OK. Tyrannosaurs had more of the
> aforementioned cursorial adaptations than any other animal in its size
> class and , hence, would have been fast enough. Maybe not as fast as
> Bakker describes them, but they were definitely in the race. They were not
> so adapted for cursorial pursuit as modern cheetahs, but so what? Their
> prey, which may have included such genera as _Edmontosaurus_ and
> _Triceratops_, were NOT gazelles! And if _T.rex_ was an active hunter, it
> may have been able to mortally wound most animals with a single shoveling
> bite, so marathon runs need not have been a part of its repertoire.
I envision T-rex as more of an ambush hunter, especially in the mixed
growth that was its most likely habitat (according to THE COMPLETE T.
REX). Can't be big and a chase hunter in heavy growth. Doesn't work.
Big generally seems to equate with an ambush hunter.