[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: PARAVES, OY....



Tetanurae@aol.com wrote:
 
<snip>

> Um, maybe.  Sereno 1997 does not formally define PARAVES, just lists it as
> the node linking an undefined Deinonychosauria (which has the implied
> topology {_Deinonychus_ + _Stenonychosaurus_}).  

Stenonychosaurus?  I thought that was an invalid genus, a junior synonym
for _Troodon_.  Has it been resurrected?

-- JSW