[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Humor: the Uses of Sickle Claws
Ralph Miller wrote:
> Yes, it may have had 101 uses. Even if it was used primarily for offense,
> we can only imagine how it was actually employed. It is presumably easier
> to refute scenarios that would appear improbable than to truly <prove> how
> these weapons were actually used. Even so, animal behavior has a way of
> surprising people who think they've seen everything.
> Back (again!) to the subject of dromaeosaurs using but a single ungual per
> pes as a primary means of attack (in concert with the manual unguals and
> teeth, of course): if it would be such a bad idea to attack in this
> fashion, then would someone please explain to me why humans (who could
> clearly fashion weapons to any specification imaginable) prefer to stab,
> gouge, lacerate, and otherwise do serious bodily harm (to fellow humans
> and/or other animals) with manual weapons which have but a single blade
> rather than a rake-like arrangement?
While this is a "bit" off topic . . but only slightly, in the process
of wondering how right or left handedness might effect this question
I wondered if research has come up dinosaur skeletons that show
clearly an animals predilection . . for one or the other. Are the
bones heavier in a dromaeosaur's favored arm/leg?
Just curious . . . don't mean to change topics.
- From: Derek Tearne <email@example.com>