[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
I believe the latest theory on hominid bipedalism is that it was a strategy
for standing taller in order to look out for predators. It USED to be
thought that it was necessitated in order to have the hands free.
Richard Leakey has done a lot of work on this.
I may have missed the post on this, so forgive me if this is "old news",
but decent, up-to-date information is SO difficult to get! :-) Does anyone
know anything about a (possibly) new saurapod found in Oklahoma? A friend
of mine has brought this up several times, but I can't locate any other
information regarding this alleged find.
Email: <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org> email@example.com
From: Matthew Troutman [SMTP:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Sunday, August 09, 1998 9:38 AM
To: email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org
<<This is still somewhat debated. Personally, I think the evidence
favors some remnant of arboreality in early hominids.>>
As do I.
<<As has been pointed out, arboreal primates are arboreal
However, the great apes are very specialized arboreal quadrupeds,
brachiators. That is, they have *greatly* elongated arms they use
swing from branch to branch. (This specialized form of locomotion,
complete with elongate arms is found convergently in the new-world
spider monkeys as well).>>
This is what I figured, I didn't speculate on it further because I
couldn't remember the brachiators from the non-brachiators.
<<Bipedal archosaurs all have a more typical "horizontal"
The origin of this is likely to be quite different.>>
<<In the case of hominids, it was due to the overly long arms,
from their unusual use in locomotion.>>
This is what I think.
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com