[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: [Fwd: Dinosaur Society]
The "crown" group of a bit more than superficially bird - like dinosaurs
is like a flower and most flowers have a stem. In this case, the stem is
an ancestral lineage that travels backward in time. Bird - like dinosaurs
didn't just appear. The crown is a product of many years of
evolution. Birds could well have evolved as a branch from the
stem. In that case they would be related to the bird - like dinosaurs and
they would represent their decendents.
Stephen Faust email@example.com
On Thu, 27 Aug 1998, Stewart, Dwight wrote:
> Sorry about the (very) late reply, but I thought the Dinosaur Society was
> defunct or nearly so. Do they even still have their web site?
> Also, I'd love to hear some comments regarding;
> "The theory that birds descended from dinosaurs has become dogma in the past
> 20 years or so, and yet a large number of people do not accept it because
> there are insurmountable problems with that theory," Feduccia said. "First,
> there is the time problem in that superficially bird-like dinosaurs occurred
> some 30 million to 80 million years after the earliest known bird, which is
> 150 million years old."
> I'm a physicist & mathematician, not a paleontologist, but I don't see any
> scientific basis for labeling the "dinosaur/bird" link as "dogma".
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Leo Herrera [SMTP:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 1998 4:22 PM
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: [Fwd: Dinosaur Society]
> << Message: Dinosaur Society >>