[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Egg shapes

Chris, etc.:
    OOPS!    I meant to say that the eggs were 2.5 inches (7 cm) in diameter - or width.
         Allan Edels
-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher Srnka <theclaw@sprintmail.com>
To: Edels@email.msn.com <Edels@email.msn.com>
Cc: Dinosaur Mailing List - Gen. Distribution <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Date: Tuesday, December 01, 1998 11:39 PM
Subject: Re: Egg shapes


Allan Edels wrote:

 Chris, et al:     You're correct about the growth series of _Protoceratops_ skulls; however, I believe that ALL the eggs that were attributed to _Protoceratops_ have now been re-identified as Oviraptorid.  The eggs in question are somewhat elongated, about 7- 9 inches (17- 20 cm) long, and no more than 2.5 inches (7 cm).     Allan Edels 

Thanks for clearing that up!