[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: DINOSAUR digest 877
In a message dated 12/22/98 12:30:13 PM EST, email@example.com writes:
<< The formal taxonomic name I was referring to (very obviously I thought)
> was Ganathostomata. The entire gist of my argument was that 'fish'
> should STAY a colloquial name, just as 'reptile' should be. >>
By the way, I think the proper vernacular from Gnathostomata would be
"gnathostomate" rather than "gnathostome."