[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

RE: TREX THE HUNTER (taken seriously?)

JSeward123@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 98-02-04 01:47:16 EST, dannj@alphalink.com.au writes:
> << Perhaps the hadrosaur was asleep and the Tyrannosaur mistook it for
>  being dead. When the carcass screamed the Tyrannosaur realised
>  its mistake, let go, and went off to search for something really
>  dead, leaving the Edmontosaur still alive. Hey, it's no sillier
>  or more extreme than some of the arguements in the bird-dinosaur
>  debate! >>
> Hi Dann! I have a question about your scenario: Assuming that T. rex's
> binocular vision and sense of smell was good enough for him to be able to
> distinguish the basics of anatomy, wouldn't he rather want to bite the
> "sleeping" Edmontosaurus' neck rather than the tail? I think that makes sense.
> I think he'd rather bite his neck.
>   Now my scenario: The T. rex was chasing the Edmontosaurus in a hunting
> pursuit. In an effort to trip the Edmontosaurus, the T. rex cocks his head to
> bite the neural spines part of his tail, and slows way down. The tough
> Edmontosaurus puts up a struggle and manages to trip the T. rex, maybe by
> swinging his stiff tail. The T. rex, now losing his balance, tries in vain to
> stay up by biting down harder on the spines. The spines snap off, and the T.
> rex comes tumbling down. He watches in humiliation as his would-be-prey gets
> away.
>   IMHO, that's a better scenario.
>   Have a nice day!
>   Jim

Yes, but no where near as amusing. We're probably talking about
a fairly inept Tyrannosaur in my scenario, so logic would not be
the best way to reconstruct the events.  :)
        Dann Pigdon
        Melbourne, Australia

        Dinosaur Reconstructions:
        Australian Dinosaurs: