[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: Dinosaur extinction
I think the main point illustrated by these points, is that by any standards
there were a lot of hazardous things happening in the Cretaceous.
I see no reason to single out any one potential cause and say "this did it",
when clearly there's not enough evidence to do so.
The principle reason that I favour continental realignment, as a root cause
is that it has the potential to be a causative factor in the others (bolides
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Kolle [SMTP:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 1998 8:18 AM
> To: John Clavin (Digital); email@example.com
> Subject: Re:Dinosaur extinction
<<part of mail removed>>
> In my opinion, these still solve little or nothing.
> 1) Dinos froze to death. Why didn't the crocodiles? They are to big to
> and they do (as far as I know) not hibernate. They are extremely
> temperature dependent (pardon my spelling), and only get female offspring
> in cold weather. If they managed to survive at the time because they found
> a way out, why have thy lost that ability?
> 2)Same problem, besides I sincerely doubt that vulcanoes errupting was a
> new thing in the K/T period.
> 3)Memory might serve me wrong, but I thought that pangea only was a
> jurassic phenomenon. However, it explains that some areas got cold, but
> others must have remained warm, ad why did they die?
> 4) Changes always happen. I doubt that no dino could adapt.
> Sad about that religous part. I think many people forget that we do not
> deal with absolute facts here. Sounds like Thomas Kuhn has got a point...