[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Arms and not Giraffatitans...

DinosØMP wrote-
> When people want to draw a Brachiosaurus, they ALLWAYS draw
> Giraffatitan...they kan draw Giraffatitan as much as they want, but write
> "Giraffatitan" as the title, and not "Brachiosaurus". They where
> different GENERA!
> pweh...

maybe you should tell us what we are doing wrong, then?

Jaime A. Headden wrote-
>I've heard it suggested (not sure exactly where) that the arm and >hand's 
>unique situation may actually have been related to mating, the male 
>holding the female to him during copulation---and this would propose 
>that the *Carnotaurus* specimen is a male---in a platypus- like way. Of 
>course, for that to work, the arm would have to be longer, no? If it 
>_was_ naturally short, then that proposal's out the window.

Wouldn't that then propose that the specimen is a female since a female
wouldn't need as long arms in that case?

"my god!  i've actually read all my mail!  what am i gonna do now??"
         {"Look where all this talking got us, baby"}
                                             o    .     _______ ~~~~~ 
                                                      /@ _____  <0>   \
                                                     /___       __/    )
             http://users.codenet.net/missraptor            ~~~       /