[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: tyrannosaur embryo
At 03:16 AM 1/16/98 EST, Dinogeorge wrote:
><< If they bought _T, rex_ in *China*, they certainly were ignorami.
> (_Tyrannosaurus_ in China, yes, _T. rex_, no). >>
>Nah--_Jenghizkhan_ in Asia, _Tyrannosaurus_ in North America. Just because
>it's big and tyrannosaurid doesn't make it _Tyrannosaurus_.
Nah, but if it does share a buttload of shared derived characters uniquely
with rex, and indeed if the type of bataar shares a few features with rex
not found even in the smaller "efremovi" material, there is a damn good case
for including it in Tyrannosaurus!!
Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
Vertebrate Paleontologist Webpage: http://www.geol.umd.edu
Dept. of Geology Email:firstname.lastname@example.org
University of Maryland Phone:301-405-4084
College Park, MD 20742 Fax: 301-314-9661