[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: If Dinosaurs Could Fly
Derek Tearne wrote:
> Kiwi feathers are pretty good insulators even though they are not
> 'downy' at all, more like long thick hairs with a bad case of split
> ends than down. Animal hairs serve well as insulation without the
> need for them to be fluffy like down. Perhaps the original proto
> feather was indeed some kind of thick hair used for insulation.
Animal hair best suited to insulation is thin and floppy and covers the anmal
more thickly than non-insulating hairs (it's smaller at the base, for one thing)
This retains body heat trapped in individual air pockets. We all know that.
How could birds develop a floppy downy feather first? Doesn't this type of
feather have signs of a stiff quill in it's get-up. Wouldn't this be more
indicative (like Toby White suggested) of a quill forming first?
What portion of a scale is equivalent to a quill structure?