[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
At 02:27 PM 7/2/98 -0500, JMNorton wrote:
>With all the new discoveries and their implications, maybe a re-statement
>of DinoGeorge's "BCF" hypothesis should be "FCF" (feathers came
>first"). Agreeing on this may start to bring the two (or more) sides in this
>debate closer together.
Actually, both BCF and the "standard model" bird orgin predict (or at least
do not reject) the idea that feathers predate _Archaeopteryx_.
Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
Vertebrate Paleontologist Webpage: http://www.geol.umd.edu
Dept. of Geology Email:firstname.lastname@example.org
University of Maryland Phone:301-405-4084
College Park, MD 20742 Fax: 301-314-9661