[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Birds Came First question.
On Thu, 2 Jul 1998, Ronald Orenstein wrote:
> At 10:04 AM 02/07/98 -0400, you wrote:
> >Birds are, with the exception of one (or two?) megapode species, united by
> >the following characteristics: intensive parental care during incubation;
> >nest siting in the open air (where parental care is necessitated--unlike
> >fossorial nests).
> This is not true. First of all, there are more than two species of megapodes
> (22 according to the latest monograph).
Yes, but only a fraction of these are hole-nesters--I think this is the
term I should have used rather than "fossorial". I realize the birds you
listed are fossorial but they all (don't they?) manipulate the nest during
> The function of parental care is far more than nest protection, of course -
> and in fact at least some megapodes (particularly the mallee fowl) are
> in almost constant attendance on the nest mound; parental care ends only
> when the young leave the nest.
In fact megapodes are unique in that they don't do _anything_ for
hatchlings. Post-hatchling care is, I believe, a uniting trait of all
other birds. And Coombs (in _Modern analogs for dinosaur nesting and
parental behavior_) argues that such hatchling independence and the long
incubation and predator-friendly vegetation mounds "necessitates nearly
total freedom from egg predation."
> So I do not think Mr. Bois' generalization is meaningful.
Out of some 9000 species of birds only 4 or so have become secondarily
turtle-like in their reproductive behavior (inasmuch as they dig, bury,
and leave their eggs). It seems fair to generalize. Sorry I got my terms