[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: CNN article(complete) on tiny Indian Dino eggs

Although the title of this post refers to DINO eggs, the article (as posted
here by Betty C. ) seems to indicate that the eggs are the SMALLEST fossil
eggs ever found, and that they might be fish eggs, NOT DINO EGGS!
-----Original Message-----
From: Phil Bigelow <bigelowp@juno.com>
To: dinosaur@usc.edu <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Date: Wednesday, July 08, 1998 4:28 PM
Subject: Re: CNN article(complete) on tiny Indian Dino eggs

>CNN sez:
>>What makes the finding unique is that the eggs are microscopic,
>                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^??
>>soft-shelled belonging to the late Gondwana Age, PTI quoted D. P. Das
>>and P. M. Datta as saying.
>>The new fossil eggs are, however, smaller than ampharyngodon <fish>
>>according to the geologists.
>Oh, common!  I didn't fall off the turnip truck yesterday! (it was
>actually a few years ago,and my head is much better now, thank you).
>This is one of those moments when I wish I could ask Dr.s  Das and Datta
>the following question:
>If it doesn't quack like a duck, and it doesn't walk like a duck and it
>swim like a duck, then maybe it isn't a duck?
>Well, I guess the parent could have been the size of a hummingbird,
>so maybe I'm asking the wrong question.
>Has anybody on the list actually read  Das and Datta's paper in _Current
>Science Journal_?  It sounds to me as though they may have found fossil
>turtle eggs.
>                                            <pb>
>bh162@scn.org     bigelowp@juno.com
>"If all the young ladies who attended the Yale promenade dance were laid
>end to end, no one would be the least suprised."    Dorothy Parker
>You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
>Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
>Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]