[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Bakker says
John Bois wrote:
> I think Bakker is correct in looking for a biological contributor in order
> to explain the _pattern_ of extinction, not extinction _per se_.
> But diseases don't do it for me. First, diseases have never been known to
> wipe out whole taxa. For starters bacteria and virus are usually
> species-specific, secondly diseases even within a single species don't
> usually knock out the entire species.
Most bacteria and viruses are species-specific, but not all. Look at the
pathogen called Rinderpest -- spread from domestic cattle to wild African
antelope, and wiped them out by the thousands, across several different
species. Look at rabies, which can infect almost any mammal species known. A
pathogen as lethal and cross-contagious as rabies that was transmitted by air
could do a heckuva job on a fauna. And some ecosystems don't need to lose all
that many species before they become unstable.
Also, I've heard some reports recently of Central American frogs -- several
species, in several genera -- getting hammered by a fungal skin disease.
Fungi and other external pathogens don't always have the same compatibility
problem between species that internal pathogens do.
-- Jon W.