[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Beautifully horrible
At 10:00 AM 7/22/98 -0700, Randy King wrote:
>This may not be quite what was intended, but my vote for the
>most horrible skull would be Piltdown man. There is nothing
>like this kind of fraud to give science a black eye.
What was so horrible about it? Certain claims to the contrary
notwithstanding, it was not universally accepted as a valid taxon: the skull
was suspected as being a chimera by some workers from the start. More
importantly, the discovery of the Recent age of the specimen was a triumph
for modern (for 1950s) techniques of geochemical dating, and thus science at
is best (as a method of testing hypotheses of the physical world).
Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
Vertebrate Paleontologist Webpage: http://www.geol.umd.edu
Dept. of Geology Email:firstname.lastname@example.org
University of Maryland Phone:301-405-4084
College Park, MD 20742 Fax: 301-314-9661