[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: TETRAPODS, PHYLOGENETIC TAXONOMY, AND CLEAR DEFINITIONS
Last night I wrote:
> Hopson discusses two
> definitions of Mammalia: the "classic" definition where a mammal is defined as
> anyhing that has all the features considered to be diagnostic of Mammalia; and
> Rowe's phylogenetic definition of Mammalia as a stem-based taxon (thx for the
> correct term) composed of the LCA of Theria and Monotremata, and all
> descendants of
> that ancestor.
Gotta stop writing messages so late at night . . . of course, Rowe was using a
based definition there. My mistake.
-- Jon W.