[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]


Larry, it seems ironic that your alleged subject is, "I COME IN PEACE",
when it begins with your saying, "Dan, Dan, Dan.  Your prejudices are
showing..."   The latter could be taken as a personal put-down with an
unabashed, highly pedantic tone.

    My impression of Dan's statement (quoted by you in the beginning of the
referenced post) is that he was not referring to stigmatization because of
any association with purely scientific UFO studies, but, instead, to your
original question as to whether I am the Ray Stanford from Texas, "who was
waiting for UFO's [sic]..."  Which might easily be taken to imply an
association with the STARGATE (or whatever it was called) cult (whose leader
was from Texas), that committed mass suicide, not so long ago.

    Now, I've responded -- once more --to this on-list only because  you've
inserted what should be a personal matter into a list posting, and, since
Mickey generously allowed you to post it, I'm hoping he will be as generous
with me.  I stress once more, this is a DINOSAUR list.  So why head a
posting, "I COME IN PEACE"? -- or discuss UFOs?

    Your posted statement, ..."the connection of a listmember [Namely ME! --
RS] to the scientific study of extraterrestrial life..." is misleading about
LIFE.  My studies are only an instrumented search for any UFO PHYSICS that
might be monitored during observation of seemingly anomalous sky objects.  I
have long stressed that the project is a straight-forward study of physics
and has no data that would point to any specific area of origin (whether
terrestrial, extra-terrestrial, or even from any speculative 'realm'
incomprehensible to us).  Now, Larry, if you, privately, have some knowledge
that UFOs have an extra-terrestrial origin, fine.  Post that to one of the
many UFO-fan lists, they'd eat it with a spoon

    This will be my last time to take up list space with a thread that
(without action from Mickey)could continue as long as 'Did certain theropods
pack hunt?'  Frankly I have better ways to make my day(s) productive -- both
for myself and, hopefully, for society.

    If you, Larry, or anyone else has questions about my cretaceous-track
studies, I will try to find time to respond; but, please, let's keep our
feet on the ground.  We could learn more about the list subject that way.

    Ray Stanford

-----Original Message-----
From: Larry Dunn <majestic_cheese@yahoo.com>
To: dinosaur@usc.edu <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Date: Friday, July 24, 1998 3:04 AM

>---Danvarner@aol.com wrote:
>>Since Larry wishes to share this with everybody, let me simply say that
>> regardless of whatever baggage you bring along with you, except,
>> running a fossil discount warehouse, anyone should be able to
>discuss relevent
>> issues here without the fear of anyone stigmatizing them.
>Dan, Dan, Dan.  Your prejudices are showing here.  How interesting
>that you'd assume that the connection of a listmember to the
>scientific study of extraterrestrial life would be "stigmatizing,"
>bringing shame upon the party involved.
>I myself am openminded about such studies and look forward to the
>publication of Ray's data so that we can all better understand these
>phenomena, and I'll wager that I'm not the only listmember to look
>forward to reading these publications.
>> In a private Email,
>> I expressed to Larry that his questions regarding Ray's interests
>were perhaps
>> more appropriately done off list.
>Had my question been the sole purpose for my post this would perhaps
>be true, but I was in fact questioning Ray's assertion that plesiosaur
>necks are proof of *anything* regarding sauropod necks.  If every post
>to the list were shot down because of a percentage of topics more
>appropriately brought up offlist, there'd be about two posts a day
>(not necessarily a bad thing).
>Perhaps we can ask James Gurney for his thoughts on this matter,
>Personally, I find Ray's observations
>> remarkably perceptive and well informed and I am looking forward to
>> more about his efforts.
>Well, now I understand!  Please supply me with a list of other
>listmembers whose observations you value so that I can avoid OT
>questions to them.
>And he also wrote:
>>   I really wish that off-list Email would not be shared with the
>rest of the
>> planet. I seem to remember posting a letter to this effect about a
>week or so
>> ago.
>>   Wasn't there someone here on the list who was talking about
>> recently? Let me see if I can remember who that was...Hmmm...
>Well, when that someone did bring up netiquette, all he took for it
>was doo-doo, shall we say.  So my new philosophy, accordingly, is
>"what's netiquette?"  It's fun!
>"Atheism -- a non-prophet organization"
>Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com