[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
On Wed, 17 Jun 1998 Jonkeria@aol.com wrote:
> Which ones? You're certain that the name used was Pelycosauria as opposed to
> the very viable monophyletic Eupelycosauria, right? It would seem odd to use
> Pelycosauria as a clade, because it would be identical to Synapsida when made
I think I've seen the reference to Pelycosauria as well (maybe on the
Berkeley phylo pages(?)) and it seems that Pelycosauria of this usage has
been synonymized with Eupelycosauria.