[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Picrodon

In a message dated 98-06-24 03:02:29 EDT, endocrin@opera.iinet.net.au writes:

<< I have Picrodon as a nomen dubium. From the references below, looks like
 Mike Keesey's suggestion that it is a prosauropod is probably correct. >>

It's emphatically >not< a prosauropod; it's some kind of carnivorous
archosaur, probably a rauisuchian. Postcranial remains that may have been
referred to Picrodon probably include material from the prosauropod Camelotia,
hence the confusion.