[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: CLADISTICS AND PALEONTOLOGIST(S) OF THE CENTURY
In a message dated 98-04-30 03:09:11 EDT, email@example.com writes:
<< Actually, among croc workers, the number is closer to the high teens -
impressive, since the number of croc workers is not in the high teens.
And, most dinosaur cladistic analyses I've seen have made heavy reference
to older analyses - in effect, they do represent reanalyses.>>
What recent croc papers I've read seem to set a higher standard than
comparable dinosaur papers (sad to say)--but this may only be because I'm way
closer to the dinosaur material than I am to croc material.