[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: random ramblings
<"Non-experts don't make substantial contributions to the science anyway, so
<why should the names be geared towards them rather to the people who are
<actually going to use it (and know what it means)?">
<Amatuers make very important and continuing contributions to this science.
<So, don't take this personally, but you're just flat-out wrong. Not a
<personal attack, just a clarification of incorrect thinking.>
Of course, you're right. I humbly retract that stupid blanket statement.
Sorry if I offended anyone.
I considered restating it, because I meant "non-experts" as in regular,
non-paleo people, not just non-professionals.
AND I meant "contributions" as in papers in which the technical names matter.
But of cousre
there are so many exceptions to this (many of them on this list!). So now I
just want to take it back all the way.
SORRY!!! : )