[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Dinosaur Genera List corrections #98
At 12:39 PM 11/4/98 -0500, TWILLIAMS@canr1.cag.uconn.edu wrote:
>For those who are interested: judging from Bakker's paper, the
>splitting of _Apatosaurus_ and _Brontosaurus_ is based upon
>features (or one feature) of the braincase: position of the
Eh, sounds rather weak to me. It is not even clear to me that this would
not show considerable individual variation.
I always try to keep in mind that Bakker is an extreme splitter as far as
genera are concerned. I find it pays to be somewhat cautious about
accepting Bakker's genera.
What I would really like to have more info. on is his reasons for
splitting out Eobrontosaurus, so I can evaluate that genus better.
May the peace of God be with you. firstname.lastname@example.org