[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Ornithoms, Parrots, and others
At 03:14 PM 11/12/98 EST, Dinogeorge@aol.com wrote:
>In a message dated 11/12/98 8:44:18 AM EST, firstname.lastname@example.org writes:
>But it isn't compatible with the "ground up" cursorial scenario of the origin
>of flight. In the "ground up" scenario, birds evolve flight as
>animals by accumulating the anatomical features associated with flight for
>non-flight reasons. They become arboreal only >after< flying makes trees
>accessible. If the standard model admits tree-climbing non-avian coelurians,
>then it is virtually indistinguishable from BCF, and I can get off my
This depends on what you mean by BCF.
The idea of tree-climbing coelurosaurs as the origin of birds does not
necessarily imply secondary flightlessness in maniraptorans. Indeed,
gliding or other forms of proto-flight may be quite restricted in
occupancies in the standard model.
Given that I suspect that a scansorial lifestyle would leave little, if
any, skeletal indicia in small animals, I do not find the idea of arboreal
coelurosaurs all that far beyond the current evidence.
May the peace of God be with you. email@example.com