[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Deinocheirus, and spinosaur systematics
In a message dated 11/15/98 7:23:18 PM EST, email@example.com writes:
<< Ah, but by breaking it in two, they get to sell it *twice*, and thus get
more money for it! Given what the collector did to _Irritator_, I find
such behavior quite believable. In fact, I begin to wonder, did they alter
the _Iritator_ skull in an attempt to keep it from being recognized as
being part of the same specimen? >>
Is interesting point, but _Angaturama_ specimen is miserable hunk of junk by
comparison with _Irritator_ specimen (Alex Kellner would probably agree).
Also, collectors probably quite savvy and realize that breaking a specimen in
two would probably bring less money in total than keeping specimen
intact--completeness of specimen is big factor in value.