[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Eoraptor question

---"Thomas R. Holtz, Jr." <th81@umail.umd.edu> wrote:
> Larry Dunn wrote:
> >Why is _Eoraptor_ supposedly closer to the basal saurischian than,
> >say, _Herrerasaurus_?
> Because, under the Sereno model, _Herrerasaurus_ shares several
> features with neotheropods that _Eoraptor_ lacks.  In other words,
> _Eoraptor_ is less divergent in form from the ancestral condition.

My apologies.  I should have clarified that I was curious about
exactly what the most notable of those derived features are.  

What does H. have that makes it more "neotheropodish" than little E.? 
I haven't been able to find these specifics in my sources, and it will
be a few days before I can get my hands on the '93 Nature paper
(assuming, perhaps wrongly, it refers to H. at all...).

"Atheism -- a non-prophet organization"


Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com