[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
>>>Anyway, regarding your statement that the anatomy of _Archaeopteryx_
"un-controversial"; whoa! That is a BIG understatement. Contrast any
Ostrom and Martin paper and you'll see the differences between
Actually, it was sarcasm. With such a strong dichotomy of opinions on
Archaeopteryx morphology (and such disperate phylogenetic inferences made
from those studies) I thought it redundant to put a ;-) at the end.