[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Tyrannosaur species
On Fri, 9 Apr 1999 08:17:13 -0400 (EDT), Thomas R. Holtz, Jr. wrote:
<Is it Tyrannosaurus lancensis, or Nanotyrannus, or is it now believed to be
a juvenile rex?>
> Standard Holtz reply #1: wait for the goddam paper!! :-) (Okay, based on
the material presented at SVP, Thom Carr has established that "Nano." is a
juvenile, and made the very convincing argument that it is a juvie _T.
However, as that paper is not currently available to the general public,
let's just say that that hypothesis is the better supported right now).>
Ok, the last I heard was that Bakker and another paleontologist, cannot
think of the name right off hand( maybe Carpenter? not sure). Ran a catscan
on the "Nano" it showed that skull sutures were fused, hence showing it
wasnt a juvenile T.rex. Also isnt there some differences in the shape of
the skull? Such as the snout and visual area? OR should I just quote
"Standard Holtz reply #1: wait for the goddam paper!!" unquote. Is it going
to be in the SVP or another journal?
Paleo Mont Research
Paleo Mont Park
"If we knew what we were doing, it wouldnt be called research, would it?" A.
Get your free, private email at http://mail.excite.com/