[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: "Dinosaurs don't count"
> "There were never more than a few species of the large dinosaurs
> around at any one time...they were angolous to modern elephants and
> rhinos: beautiful and interesting, but carying little information....
> Add to this the fact that dinosaurs, because they were land animals
> rarely left fossils, and you have a situation where the kind of fossil
> that is most interesting to the public is probably least interesting
> to scientists"....
...using the same logic, I presume he implies that hominids are least
interesting to scientists also. We too are land animals rarely left
as fossils and with very few species around at any one time!
Dinosaurs have challenged scientists at many levels and from many
diciplines. Perhaps this James Trefil is not a scientist himself?
There are many instances of people who call themselves scientists,
but cannot accept factual evidence because it is contrary to their
preconceived ideas and beliefs ..... but that is another story.
Dinosaurs are crucial in helping scientist obtain a clearer
understanding of terrestrial life during the mesozoic. Admittedly,
there are a disproportianately large number of researchers working on
dinosaurs than fossil bacteria, crustacea, annelids etc (which
contribute more to the fossil record than the dinosaurs do). Anyway,
there is only one of us in Scotland, and I don't restrict my research
PS..... dinosurs are great to work with!
Neil 'Jurassic' Clark