[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Pseudo-Sinosauropteryx?

or rephrased, what are the details that may mean it's not

-Betty Cunningham

Timothy Williams wrote:
> Nick Longrich wrote:
> >Also, if the comments on the ilium and ischium refer to GMV 2124,
> >which is the larger of the two theropods on display in the National
> >Geographic exhibit and splashed over two pages of their feathered dinosaur
> >issue, there are questions about whether this is, in fact, a
> >Sinosauropteryx, so it can't really be brought into the debate.
> This certainly got my attention!  GMV 2124 may not be  _Sinosauropteryx_?
> Any details concerning what it might be?

Flying Goat Graphics
(Society of Vertebrate Paleontology member)