[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
_Protoavis_ (was RE: Important feathered dinosaurs)
> From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]On Behalf Of
> Larry Febo
> >Except that it doesn't according to most authorities, and there are no
> >"quill nodes" (just a ridge that might possibly have provided attachment
> >for something, maybe).
> OK. Perhaps the nodes are questionable. What about the triosseal canal?
> ...the large keeled sternum??
> It seems that the majority don`t see it as being avian, but
> then,...what is
> it? I haven`t heard any alternate proposals put forward as to
> what it could
> possibly be?
The majority opinion is not "what is it?", but "what are they?"; or, as some
have said, "it seems to be a fauna, not a taxon".
I do not recall anyone setting down in print (in the technical literature)
an element-by-element, taxon-by-taxon description of the _Protoavis_
material, but opinions voiced by various authors seem to converge on several
The braincase is probably theropodan;
The manus is probably rauisuchian (and Sereno 1997 suggests it is a foot,
not a hand);
Some of the limb elements are some non-archosaurian diapsid (can't recall
what was the suggestion: prolacertiform, maybe?).
The most-missed of all Ostrom Symposium talks (i.e., one which was supposed
to be given, but wasn't) was Larry Witmer's analysis of _Protoavis_. I am
still looking forward to what he has to say about it.
Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
Department of Geology Director, Earth, Life & Time Program
University of Maryland College Park Scholars
College Park, MD 20742
Phone: 301-405-4084 Email: email@example.com
Fax (Geol): 301-314-9661 Fax (CPS-ELT): 301-314-7843