[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Another Alxasaurus query (was: thanks and ...)
---"Jaime A. Headden" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Okay, I am operating on the assumption that segnosaurs are
Aren't they considered to be?
With all due respect to George (and I don't mean that sarcastically),
is there real controversy among dinosaur paleontologists about the
assignment of these dinosaurs ("therizinosaurs"/"segnosaurs")?
If so, has anyone published a critique of the Russell/Dong analysis in
a (all together now) peer-reviewed scientific journal?
The fourth toe is awfully odd, isn't it? Is there an analogy that can
be drawn in, say, extant mammals?
"You are interested in the unknown, the mysterious, the unexplainable -- that
is why you are here. And now, for the first time, we are bringing you the full
story of what happened ... on that fateful day."
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com