[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Gasosaurus (was Re: MJ coelurosaurians)
On Thu, 11 Feb 1999, Thomas R. Holtz, Jr. wrote:
> The illo isn't bad. However, the supposed "carnosaurian" or "megalosaurian"
> features (trapezoidal ischial obturator process, retention of the obturator
> foramen, retention of the ischial foot) are primitive features for
> Avetheropoda and its immediate outgroups (_Afrovenator_, etc.). These
> features are also found in basal carnosaurs (_Monolophosaurus_,
> _Yangchaunosaurus_, etc.),
_Monolophosaurus_ does not have an obturator flange of any kind, if the
original description is accurate. It retains a full ischiadic plate,
pierced by a foramen. IMHO, that makes it a basal tetanuran or an
avetheropod more basal than _Afrovenator_ or spinosaurs.
As discussed before, published illustrations of the pelvis of
_Yangchuanosaurus_ are a mess. I tend to rely more on the pelvis of
_Sinraptor_ to illustrate sinraptorid characters.
All right. I'll give you that the quadrangular obturator flange seen in
carnosaurs may be a basal avetheropod feature, further "whittled down" in
coelurosaurs into a triangular obturator process. But that means that
spinosaurs are most likely basal avetheropods as well (or carnosaurs),
rather than megalosaur relatives.
> although some (the obturator foramen) are lost in
> allosaurid carnosaurs,
and carcharodontosaurids; sinraptorids show an intermediate stage, with
the obturator foramen largely surrounded by a bony hook.
> and independently in advanced coelurosaurs.
Pacific Lutheran University
Tacoma, WA 98447