[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Feathers as fossilized behaviour (was:Re: Function Talks at Ostrom Symposium)
> Not precisely what I meant. I meant to refer to the straitened, neat
>feathers as relating to taphonomic resetting after the animal's death,
>by drowning or whatever.
I gathered that, but I still consider it unlikely - however, this is one
idea that ought to be easy to test. Get some feathers, separate the barbs,
drag 'em through the water and see what happens....
> Okay, oviraptors may not have had feathers to preen, yet they (or at
>least two, *Ingenia* and *Conchoraptor) have denticulate margins to
>their premaxillae; who knows what shape the rhamphothecae (if any) may
>have taken on _top_ of those margins.
Additionally, diet may have
>presumed loss of teeth, and at first this might suggest additional
>loss of feathers for lack of a preening tool, but dietary habits would
>have not the same pressures for loss as you proposed for
True as well - again, this was a sort of throwaway speculation at the end
of my post. I gather you buy the main points?
Ronald I. Orenstein Phone: (905) 820-7886
International Wildlife Coalition Fax/Modem: (905) 569-0116
1825 Shady Creek Court
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada L5L 3W2 mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org