[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: R: One for the bird brigade
>The Hoatzin have some primitive characters together with some
>specializzation (I don't know this because the text do not cited) and it is
>not a good flighting bird because it has a short sternal carina and have a
>pectoral muscle not well developed. For me Hoatzin is the best example for
>understanding the life style of Archaeopteryx.
Fine, as long as it is understood that the hoatzin is an analogue to
Archaeopteryx, not a near relative (similar to saying that ostriches are
the best living animals for understanding the lifestyle of ornithomimids).
As with any such analogue, comparisons have to be made very carefully. For
example, there is no reason to conclude that Archaeopteryx was, like the
hoatzin, a folivore with a highly-developed social system.
Ronald I. Orenstein Phone: (905) 820-7886
International Wildlife Coalition Fax/Modem: (905) 569-0116
1825 Shady Creek Court
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada L5L 3W2 mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org