[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: WHY I USED LAMBEOSAURUS (really old post!)

In a message dated 97-07-03 21:40:02 EDT, Tetanurae@aol.com writes:

<< Well, besides the reasons that George mentioned, ie that _Iguanodon_ could
 become a nomen dubium (ACK!!!), >>

List members will be interested to know that the ICZN has been petitioned to
make _Iguanodon bernissartensis_ the new type species of _Iguanodon_ (case
3037), replacing _Iguanodon anglicus_. If this motion passes (and sentiment is
running something like ten to one for it), _Iguanodon_ will no longer be a
_nomen dubium_ but will have a beautiful skeleton (IRSNB 1534) as the type
specimen of its type species _Iguanodon bernissartensis_, and a long-standing
nomenclatural gaffe will have been corrected. Of course, there will still
remain the problem of what to do about those miscellaneous teeth that
constitute the type series of _Iguanodon anglicus_--i.e., are they really
referable to _Iguanodon_? But that's not nearly so pressing an issue.