[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Point of brooding is...
On Sat, 6 Mar 1999, Ronald Orenstein wrote:
> This is not, as I understand, what Tom Hopp is talking about.
I am not arguing for or against his position. Remiges may or may not have
evolved to enhance the retention of heat which, as you say, is delivered
by a sometimes naked brood patch. But feathers are not necessary for
brooding--except in extreme environments, eg., Antarctica. And, inasmuch
as there may be a cost associated with their possession--enrgy to grow
them, parasites living in them, excess baggage for speedy running, one
would think there would be easier ways in equable climates to maintain a
What I was arguing was your statement that if they were advantageous to
brooding, then other non-flying egglaying animals would grow them. I
don't think you can say that unless the animals in question are warm
blooded, since the presumed advantage would be to retain heat. And with
few exceptions, birds are it. I was amused at the prospect of feathered
turtles. And so I asked which animals you meant?