[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: T. rex
On Sun, 7 Mar 1999, Patrick Norton wrote:
> 5) (?= Nanotyrannus lancensis Bakker et al., 1988) (= Albertosaurus
> megagracilis Paul 1988);
I've never heard of anyone directly sinking _A. megagracilis_ into _N.
lancensis_. What I have heard is that both may be different growth stages
of _T. rex_, thus removing both these "species" from consideration as _T.
rex_'s closest competition.
Pacific Lutheran University
Tacoma, WA 98447
- Re: T. rex
- From: "Patrick Norton" <email@example.com>